|
Monday, April 27, 2009 - 7:03 AM
No. 1004 September 20, 1941 #420. FROM: Tokyo (Toyoda) TO: Vichy
(Secret outside the department.) (Part 1 of 2.)
Re my #418[a].
I am sending the following information for your
reference. 1. Condition of Quartering Troops.
(a) Saigon and its vicinity. Despite the negotiations
carried on locally, they refuse absolutely to allow the Japanese to use some of
the barracks and houses belonging to French Indo-China, merely permitting the
use of-----of Annamites, and they are quartered in a limited space with two
persons per one "tsubo"[b] and despite the fact that for the
present----------hundred
[A-509]
thousand "tsubo" is necessary (please keep this matter
strictly secret from the other side), they have not offered us the use of the
warehouses of the French Army and----------under French management. We have
rented and are using only the rice warehouses belonging to the Chinese and
situated in one section of the race track.
At Konota[c] and Natoran[c] the quarters are provided in
barracks and school buildings. At Kamuran the quarters are very much limited
because there are no buildings. At Kacusanjakku[c] our barracks----------. At
Baria[c] the troops are camping here and there because there are no buildings.
At Punopen[c] and Sienhreapu[c] the quarters are extremely narrow. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
[a] See III, 1001. [b]
Approximately 6 ft. square. [c] Kana spelling.
Trans. 9-29-41
No. 1005 September 20, 1941 #420. FROM: Tokyo (Toyoda) TO: Vichy
(Part 2 of 2.)
2. The French Indo-China authorities have requested
that a detailed agreement be concluded regarding joint defense. They would like
to have the French Indo-China forces be responsible for the border regions
facing China and Thailand and have the Japanese forces be responsible for the
remaining areas. It seems that the French Indo-China forces are anxious not to
provoke the Chinese Army. However, it is our desire that this matter be arranged
in detail between the Japanese and the French Indo-China Armies (please keep
this strictly secret and only to yourself).
3. Inasmuch as facilities at airports and barracks
are concerned, this question logically comes within matters which should be
settled locally, and so we have no intention of negotiating it. We have already
referred this matter, together with the purport of paragraph 2 above, to the
local army. Should the French authorities approach you with anything in the
nature of a protest regarding these questions, do not heed them, but after
suitability replying to them, arrange to have them handled as questions to be
settled between the armies. http://www.bebo.com/LouisS205
4. Furthermore, in order to assist in these
negotiations, I am arranging to have Finance official YUMOTO go to your city
from Berlin, and so have him cooperate with you as much as possible as soon as
he arrives.
Trans. 9-29-41
No. 1006 September 23, 1941 #524. FROM: Vichy (Japanese
Ambassador) TO: Tokyo (Gaimudaijin)
According to a conversation between a member of the
German Embassy in Paris and a member of our staff, the French Government, since
the outbreak of the German-Soviet war, has offered various suggestions for the
revision of the terms of the armistice. So far as Germany is concerned, they are
confident regarding the outcome of the German-Soviet war, and they feel no
anxiety regarding the coming war with England. So far as it does not interfere
in military
[A-510]
THE "MAGIC" BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR
affairs, the progress of Franco-German cooperation is a
thing to be desired, and the preliminary machinations have been begun for
creating such an atmosphere of cooperation.
Furthermore, the matter of maintaining general peace in
the occupied area is hardly a problem any more. The impression that our official
received was that as a result of the outbreak of the Russo-German war, German
military force in the occupied areas in general has been increased more or
less.
Trans. 9-25-41
No. 1007 September 23, 1941 #522. FROM: Vichy (Japanese
Ambassador) TO: Tokyo (Gaimudaijin)
Re my #510.[a]
I made representations along the line you laid down,
however, on the 22nd Akunaru[b] told Harada that Saigon had made inquiry of the
Tokyo Specie Bank on the 9th regarding the problem of the disposition of the
August allotment of free yen, but had received no reply as yet, and hence until
they could see their way through the problem, they were not prepared to accept
our proposal of paying 1 3 contained in my caption
message, part (3).
Inasmuch as a decision on the September allotment is
urgent, there is no other way than for us to accept one of the French proposals
contained in my caption message, I believe.
[a] Not available. [b] Arnold of
Vichy Foreign Office.
Trans. 9-25-41
No. 1008 September 24, 1941 #526. FROM: Vichy TO: Tokyo
Re your #471[a].
On the 24th, I saw Vice-Premier DARLAN and requested the
payment of 66,000,000 piastres as this year's supplementary payment for the
expense of the Japanese army in French Indo-China (for his reference, I gave him
the gist of the request in writing). DARLAN said that he understood that we
wanted the French Government to lend the money temporarily, and so I replied
that we, of course, intended to repay the sum advanced by means of gold, the
free yen, or foreign currency. I then explained that the payment of the
23,000,000 piastres, which is the amount for September and October, required
immediate decision. DARLAN understood this, and after calling Vice-Minister
ROSIA, immediately got in touch with the offices concerned and ordered-----. http://www.bebo.com/LouisS205
I had HARADA at once negotiate the details.
[a] Not available.
Trans. 9-26-41
[A-511]
No. 1009 October 1, 1941 #428. FROM: Tokyo TO: Vichy
Your #536[a], my #427[b] replied to the matters in your
message.
We will transmit a concrete proposal for method of
payment in a follow-up message. Details can be negotiated later, impress upon
the French the urgency of negotiating this matter.
[a] Not available. [b] Not
available.
Trans. 10-8-41
No. 1010 September 24, 1941 #529. FROM: Vichy TO: Tokyo
Re my #515[a].
On the 22nd HARADA again explained to ARNALD that we are
already in contact with the Germans in Berlin and Paris on this question.
ARNALD, however, expressed quite a few grievances on the part of France saying
that our exports to French Indo-China were not proceeding as well as might be
expected; that the various methods of payment were unreliable; and that in case
she could not export to the United States, France would prefer to stock
surpluses. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
As I have told you in a number of messages the main
difficulty concerning our occupation expenses, methods of payment, and the
matter in question seems to be in the manner in which the economic treaty is at
present being carried out. That seems to be the impression here. I want you,
therefore, please to inform me by return wire the present state of affairs and
the prospects for the future.
Relayed to Berlin.
[a] Not available.
Trans. 9-26-41
No. 1011 September 24, 1941 #527. FROM: Vichy TO: Tokyo
During my conversation mentioned in my #526,[a] DARLAN
said that he had recently gotten some very unsatisfactory reports from French
Indo-China. He said that, therefore, he would like for Ambassador YOSHIZAWA to
take up his post at the earliest possible moment.
I should like to know just when the Ambassador will
start for his office. Please wire me back.
[a] See III, 1008.
Trans. 9-26-41
[A-512]
THE "MAGIC" BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR
No. 1012 September 24, 1941 #528. FROM: Vichy (Kato) TO: Tokyo
(To be kept a department secret.)
Re your #422.[a]
At the time of our conversation mentioned in my #526,[b]
I referred to the matter in question, and DARLAN said, "No, it is all news to
me, and I cannot believe it, I assure you. Some time ago on the occasion of the
conclusion of the Tokyo-Bangkok agreement, American Ambassador LEAHY came and
said, 'I have received instructions from my home government and wish to inform
you that the Government of the United States is displeased with the pact in
question.' I replied, 'Well, we are taking this action, having considered the
respective positions of both Japan and France with reference to French
Indo-China, and I want to ask you please to stay out of this affair.'
"I am sure that we could have gained nothing whatever by
resisting Germany in Europe and, similarly, there would be no point in our
wrangling with Japan in the Far East. This is my conviction, for I do not see
how you could suspect us of trying to get the United States to intervene in this
sort of matter. Besides, what could the United States do?" Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire
[a] See III, 998. [b] See III,
1008.
Trans. 10-7-41
No. 1013 October 2, 1941 #429. FROM: Tokyo TO: Vichy
The troops of occupation in northern French Indo-China
continually asked the French Indo-China officials to transfer to Haiphong some
60,000 railroad ties that were in the neighborhood of Langson near the Chinese
border north of Bandoeng. They did nothing about this, and finally we decided
that the only thing to do was to seize the railway between Bandoeng and Haiphong
temporarily by force and change these ties ourselves. We made ready, and the
army approved our measures, declaring that obviously the French officials were
not cooperating with us. Finally, on the 29th, we began the shipments.
Trans. 10-4-41
|