|
Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 7:57 AM
Over the past quarter-century, opponents of physician-assisted death
have argued against the practice on the grounds that vulnerable
groups—the very old, the poor, and the mentally ill, to name
three—would turn to, or be pushed toward, such deaths in
disproportionate numbers. http://ljsheehan.blogspot.com
A review of records from Oregon and the
Netherlands undermines that argument. Instead, people who receive help dying tend to be better educated and better off than the general population. The
review also finds that, in fact, few people in Oregon have died with a
physician's help. Since the practice became legal in 1997, only 292
people—of whom 85 percent were in hospice care—have chosen to end their
lives with a lethal prescription. That number amounts to 0.15 percent
of all deaths in the state. In the Netherlands, which has a more
flexible euthanasia policy, about 2 percent of deaths annually are via
self- or physician-administered lethal narcotics. http://ljsheehan.blogspot.com
"It's something
that only a very small fraction are choosing, but many people say the
possibility is comforting to explore," says Margaret Battin, a
philosophy professor at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, who
led the review. Battin advocates legalized physician-assisted suicide
to allow people to "choose the death that is least worst for them." The
report, from a team including researchers in Oregon and the
Netherlands, appears in the October Journal of Medical Ethics. http://ljsheehan.blogspot.com
The
team reviewed government reports and independent studies of patient
records. It also evaluated surveys of the practices of health care
workers. Of 10 groups the researchers identified as
vulnerable—including people older than 80, women, the uninsured, the
poor, people with little education, people with physical disabilities,
people with mental illnesses, minors, and racial and ethnic
minorities—only people with HIV infections or AIDS were overrepresented
in the physician-assisted death statistics. "These findings call
into question the claim that the risks associated with legalization [of
physician-assisted death] will fall most heavily on potentially
vulnerable populations," says Timothy Quill, a palliative care
specialist at the University of Rochester (N.Y.) School of Medicine.
Quill wasn't involved in the study. Thirty-five U.S. states ban
physician-assisted suicide, and Oregon is the only state to explicitly
permit it. There, two doctors must certify that a patient wanting to
end his or her life is mentally competent and has less than 6 months to
live. A doctor then can write a prescription for a lethal dose of drugs
but can't administer it. The Netherlands allows physicians to assist in
the death of a patient who, even if not terminal, faces "unbearable and
hopeless suffering."
|