|
Tuesday, July 22, 2008 - 6:26 PM
http://ljsheehan.blogspot.com While many cattle are stuffed full of grain, grass-fed cattle have
been heralded as a greener way to get beef because it diminishes the
need to feed the animals antibiotics and has a smaller carbon
footprint, not to mention that it yields beef with less saturated fat.
Those of us lucky (or wealthy) enough to feast on grass-fed beef can
rest easy knowing we have taken a step toward protecting planet
Earth—or so we thought. It turns out there’s a hitch: Cow burps, which send methane into the atmosphere, may increase global warming. http://ljsheehan.blogspot.com
Cattle are responsible for 20 percent of U.S. emissions of methane,
which traps heat in the atmosphere 20 times more effectively than
carbon dioxide. “Greener” grass-fed cattle are part of this methane
problem too. The reason is lignin—a hard-to-digest substance in the
plant cell wall. Resistant to ordinary digestion, lignin must be
converted to energy with the help of microflora inhabiting a cow’s gut.
As the microflora degrade the lignin, methane is released. But for
those who eat grass-fed beef, there may be a solution. To take care of
a cow’s gas problem, the Australian company Gramina
has developed genetically modified grass that contains less lignin,
making it easier—and more polite—to digest. “Genetically modified grass
could be an appealing solution,” says Carnegie Mellon engineer
Christopher Weber, who recently released a report on issues surrounding
beef’s contribution to greenhouse gases. It could be more acceptable to
the carnivores among us, he adds, “than meat grown in test tubes or giving up meat altogeth
|
|
| << Navigate to Tuesday, July 22, 2008 |
Add New Comment |